Property Overview: 222 Rutland Street, Winnipeg
Section 1: Key Characteristics & Appeal
This one-storey home on Rutland Street is a classic, no-frills property that presents a clear value proposition. Built in 1918, its 720 sqft living area is modest and below the citywide average, placing it among the smaller homes in the King Edward neighbourhood. The lot is a manageable 2,523 sqft. Key features include a basement (not renovated) and no garage. Recent sales data shows steady appreciation, with the home selling approximately every two to three years over the past decade.
Its primary appeal lies in affordability and location within an established central neighbourhood. The assessed value is notably low compared to the Winnipeg city average, suggesting a potentially lower property tax burden and an accessible entry point into the market. This isn't a move-in-ready showcase home; its appeal is for a buyer who sees potential in the basics—a solid, century-old structure on its own lot—without paying for premium finishes or size.
This property would best suit a pragmatic first-time buyer, an investor looking for a straightforward rental, or a hands-on individual willing to make gradual improvements. It’s for someone who prioritizes location and land ownership over square footage, and who views a home as a long-term project rather than an immediate destination.
Section 2: Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is this a "tear-down" or a livable home?
Based on its consistent sales history and maintained assessed value, it is likely a livable, functional home. However, its age and mention of an unrenovated basement indicate it requires basic upkeep and any modernizations would be the responsibility of the new owner.
2. Why is the assessed value so much lower than the city average?
The assessed value is based on the property's market value for taxation purposes. This figure reflects the home's modest size, age, and specific local market conditions in King Edward, not necessarily its potential sale price. It often results in proportionally lower property taxes.
3. What does the sales history pattern indicate?
The home has sold roughly every 2-3 years since 2016. This could suggest it has been used as a rental property (a "turnover" asset) or that it has attracted a series of entry-level owners who outgrew it. It shows consistent market demand at its price point.
4. Are there any major concerns with a house from 1918?
While the structure has proven durable, a prospective buyer should budget for and investigate systems common to homes of this era, such as the foundation, plumbing, electrical wiring, and insulation. An inspection is essential.
5. How does the lack of a garage and smaller lot impact daily life?
This means on-street parking and limited private outdoor space. For some, this is a worthwhile trade-off for a central location. It suits a household with one vehicle or someone comfortable with urban street parking. The smaller lot also means less maintenance.