243 Avior Drive

243 Avior Drive – Property Overview

Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This is a newly built home (2024) on Avior Drive in Winnipeg’s West Kildonan Industrial area. Its strongest selling point is its living space: at roughly 1,708 square feet, it’s larger than both the neighbourhood and citywide averages. The assessed value of $100,000, however, sits well below the street average of $498,900, the neighbourhood average of $442,900, and the citywide average of $390,100. The land area of 3,122 square feet is smaller than most comparable homes on the street (average 4,457 sqft) but falls roughly in the middle for the neighbourhood.

The appeal here is a straightforward one: you get a newer, spacious home at a significantly lower assessed value than what’s typical nearby. That likely means lower property taxes compared to neighbouring houses, even if the interior size is generous. The trade-off is a compact lot—something that might matter less to buyers who prioritize indoor square footage over a large yard.

This property would suit a buyer looking for a relatively new construction with good interior space, who isn’t fussed about having a big garden or a high-end lot. It could also appeal to someone who values predictability in tax bills and isn’t trying to compete with the higher-priced homes on the block. It’s less ideal for those wanting a large outdoor area or a property that tracks closely with the street’s overall value profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is the assessed value of $100,000 a typo or an error?
It’s not likely a typo. The property was built in 2024, so the assessment may reflect a base land value or an early-stage valuation before the home was fully completed and reassessed. Comparable homes on the same street show much higher averages, which suggests this property has not yet been updated to reflect its finished state. You should verify with the city’s assessment office for the most current figure.

2. How does the small lot size affect daily living or resale?
The lot is 3,122 sqft—noticeably smaller than the street average of 4,457 sqft. In practice, this means less yard maintenance, but also less privacy from neighbours and limited space for additions like a large deck, shed, or garden. Resale wise, some buyers may see a compact lot as a drawback, while others appreciate the lower upkeep.

3. Why are the rankings described as “Top 100%” or “Top 99%”?
Those rankings mean the property is at the very bottom of the scale for that metric. For example, “Top 100%” out of 44 homes on the street means it ranks last in that category. So while the phrase “Top” sounds positive, it’s actually the lowest tier. The colour coding (likely red or grey) is meant to flag a below-average position.

4. How does the living area compare to typical homes in this price range?
At 1,708 sqft, this home is roomier than the neighbourhood average of 1,591 sqft and the citywide average of 1,342 sqft. Given its low assessed value, the living area is a real standout—it offers more interior space than many homes with higher tax assessments. That’s an uncommon combination and worth highlighting if you value square footage.

5. What does “no ranking data” for year built and living area mean?
It likely means the data source doesn’t have enough comparable properties to calculate a meaningful rank for those categories—often because the home is too new, or the sample size is too small. It doesn’t indicate a problem with the property itself; it just means those specific comparisons aren’t available.