This is a 1,121 sqft home built in 1894, on a 3,447 sqft lot, with an assessed value of $123k. Its main draw is value per square foot. The living area is slightly above average for its street (top 27%) and sits in the middle of the pack for the neighborhood, but the assessed value is well below both the street and city averages. That means you’re getting a relatively spacious floor plan for a low price point. The land area is close to the neighborhood norm, but small by citywide standards.
The appeal here isn’t about curb appeal or modern finishes—it’s about starting point. The home’s age (among the oldest on the street and in the city) suggests it likely needs significant updating, but that also opens the door for a buyer who wants to build equity through renovation. The low assessed value relative to the living space signals potential upside if the right work is done.
This property suits a hands-on buyer—someone comfortable with older homes and the maintenance they require. It’s less ideal for someone looking for a move-in-ready, low-maintenance home. Investors, first-time buyers with renovation experience, or anyone who values square footage over turnkey condition would find it a practical fit.
-
Is the low assessed value a sign that the property is overpriced or in poor condition?
Not necessarily. The assessed value ($123k) is below street and neighborhood averages, which suggests the home may need work or that recent sales in the area have outpaced its condition. It’s worth comparing the list price against that assessment and factoring in renovation costs. If the list price is close to the assessment, you’re likely paying for square footage rather than finish.
-
How does the age of the home affect insurance and upkeep?
Homes built in 1894 are often on older foundations, have original wiring or plumbing, and may contain materials like lead paint or asbestos. Insurance can be higher, and some providers may require an inspection before issuing a policy. Budget for regular maintenance and potential system replacements—not just cosmetic updates.
-
What does “top 27% for living area on the street” actually mean in real terms?
It means the home is larger than 73% of other homes on Magnus Avenue. At 1,121 sqft, it’s about 100 sqft bigger than the street average. That extra space could be a deciding factor if you need room for a home office or separate living areas, but don’t expect sprawling rooms—it’s likely a compact layout typical of the era.
-
Given the small lot, is there room for expansion or an addition?
The lot is 3,447 sqft, which is average for the neighborhood but small citywide. Zoning and setback rules in William Whyte will dictate what’s possible. Most older homes on similar lots don’t offer much room for side or rear additions without sacrificing yard space. A better bet is interior reconfiguration or finishing a basement (if height allows).
-
What’s the neighborhood like, and does the ranking data reflect crime or schools?
The ranking data here is purely about physical attributes—living area, value, land size, and age. It doesn’t reflect safety, school quality, or amenities. William Whyte is an older, established area with a mix of housing stock. It’s a good idea to check local crime maps, school catchment areas, and walkability scores separately if those matter to you.