Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile
This is a 1963-built home with 1,495 sq. ft. of living space on a 5,119 sq. ft. lot, located on Whitegates Crescent in the Westwood area. The property’s main appeal is its interior size: it ranks in the top 22% on its street and top 28% in the neighbourhood for square footage, meaning it offers noticeably more room than many nearby homes. The assessed value sits close to the local and city averages, suggesting the price is aligned with what similar properties command, with no obvious premium for the extra space.
The lot, however, is smaller than typical for the street and the neighbourhood—ranking in the bottom 7% on Whitegates Crescent. The build year is on the older side locally, though it aligns with the city-wide median. This creates a trade-off: generous interior space on a compact lot, in a home that’s not one of the newer options in the immediate area.
This property would suit buyers who prioritize indoor square footage over a large yard or a more recent build—families who need room for living areas and bedrooms, or those who see the smaller lot as less maintenance. It may be less appealing to someone looking for a substantial outdoor space or a house that stands out as newer on the street.
Five Possible FAQs
1. How does the living space compare to other homes on the street?
It’s above average. With 1,495 sq. ft., this home ranks 22nd out of 102 properties on Whitegates Crescent, putting it in the top 22% for interior size. The average on the street is about 1,318 sq. ft.
2. Is the property overpriced based on its assessed value?
The assessed total value of $387,000 is close to the street average of $377,000 and slightly below the neighbourhood average of $392,000. It ranks in the middle third locally. No indication of a premium or a bargain based on this metric alone.
3. The lot looks small—what does that mean practically?
At 5,119 sq. ft., the lot is smaller than most on the street and in Westwood. You’ll have less lawn to maintain and a more compact outdoor area. For context, the street average is around 5,903 sq. ft., so the difference is modest in real terms but noticeable compared to neighbours.
4. What’s the significance of the 1963 build year?
It’s a few years older than the typical home on this street (average 1966), but in line with the wider city median. Not unusually old for the area, but you’re not buying one of the newer houses in the neighbourhood. Expect systems and finishes that may reflect a 1960s construction unless updated.
5. How does this home compare to others in Westwood as a whole?
It ranks in the top 28% for living space in the neighbourhood, so it’s roomier than average for the area. The lot, however, is in the bottom 4% for size. The assessed value and build year are both close to the neighbourhood medians. It’s a relatively spacious house on a smaller lot, compared to what’s typical in Westwood.