668 Scurfield Boulevard

668 Scurfield Boulevard – Property Summary

Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This is a 1997 home in Winnipeg’s Whyte Ridge neighbourhood with 1,211 sqft of living space on a 5,251 sqft lot. Its assessed value sits at $464,000.

The property’s appeal is not in standing out on its own street or neighborhood—it ranks in the bottom quartile for both living area and assessed value locally. Instead, its strength is relative to the broader city. Citywide, the home ranks in the top 26% for assessed value and top 19% for newer construction. The living area is essentially average citywide. This means you’re getting a home that feels modest within an established suburban area, but holds above-average value and modernity compared to the overall Winnipeg housing stock.

The lot is slightly smaller than the neighborhood average but still comfortable. The year built (1997) puts it well ahead of the citywide median (1966), so major systems and construction are likely in better shape than many older Winnipeg homes.

This property would suit a buyer who prioritizes a newer, well-valued home in a mature neighborhood, and is comfortable not having the largest house on the street. It’s a practical fit for someone who wants Whyte Ridge’s location and amenities but isn’t aiming for top-tier square footage or lot size. It could also appeal to an investor or first-time buyer looking for solid citywide value without paying a premium for the largest home in the area.

Five Possible FAQs

1. How does this home compare to others on the same street?
It’s on the smaller and lower-valued side. On Scurfield Boulevard, it ranks near the bottom (top 97–98%) for both living area and assessed value. Most homes on the street are larger and assessed higher.

2. Is the assessed value fair for what you get?
Relative to the street and neighborhood, the value is below average. But citywide, it’s above average—$464,000 is in the top 26% of Winnipeg homes. The assessment reflects a modest home in a desirable area, not a standout property locally.

3. How old is the home, and is that a concern?
Built in 1997, it’s newer than roughly 80% of homes citywide. That’s a strong advantage. Mechanicals, framing, and insulation are likely more modern than average, which can mean fewer immediate repairs compared to older stock. On its own street, it’s about average age.

4. Is the lot size a limitation?
At 5,251 sqft, it’s slightly smaller than the street and neighborhood averages (around 5,755 and 6,175 sqft respectively). It’s not small, but it won’t offer oversized yards typical of older suburban lots. Citywide, it sits near the median, so it’s fairly standard.

5. Who is this home not a good fit for?
Buyers looking for the largest or most impressive home in the immediate area should look elsewhere. Similarly, anyone wanting a generous lot or a home that clearly outranks its neighbours will find this property falls short locally. It’s best for someone who values neighborhood feel and citywide value over street-level prestige.