178 Maureen Street – Property Summary
Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile
This is a 1,360-square-foot home built in 1967, sitting on a 5,119-square-foot lot in Winnipeg’s Westwood neighborhood. Its assessed value is $385,000.
The property’s main draw is consistency. Across street, neighborhood, and citywide comparisons, it lands in the average-to-slightly-above-average range for size, value, and age. The lot is a notable exception: at 5,119 square feet, it's smaller than most Westwood properties—ranking in the bottom 4% of the neighborhood—but closer to the norm citywide. That means you’re getting a home that fits the local character without paying for extra land you may not need.
Year built is a genuine highlight. On Maureen Street, this home is one of the newer ones (ranked 2nd out of 19), and within Westwood it also sits above average. For a 1967 build, that’s a solid position.
This property would suit buyers who want a straightforward, well-positioned home in an established neighborhood—no surprises, no premium for a large yard, but a reliable floor plan and reasonable taxes. It's a good fit for someone who values location and livable space over lot size, or a first-time buyer looking for a home that aligns with neighborhood norms without stretching the budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. How does the assessed value compare to similar homes nearby?
It’s right around the neighborhood average ($392,100) and citywide average ($390,100). Street-level, it's slightly above the Maureen Street average of $379,200. So you're paying a fair price relative to the area, not above market.
2. Is the lot size a disadvantage?
Only if you need a big yard. In Westwood, most homes sit on larger lots (averaging 6,491 sqft), so this one is compact by local standards. But citywide, it's typical. It means less maintenance and a lower purchase price for the land component.
3. How does the living space compare to other 1960s homes?
At 1,360 square feet, it's very close to the averages at every level—street, neighborhood, and city. It’s a standard size for a home of this era, not unusually small or large.
4. What’s the overall condition likely to be?
The data doesn’t speak to condition directly, but being built in 1967 and ranking well for its age locally suggests it has been maintained or updated in line with its peers. A home inspection would be needed to confirm, but the numbers indicate it’s not an outlier in need of major catching up.
5. How does this property compare to others on Maureen Street specifically?
It's near the top for year built (2nd out of 19), above average for assessed value (8th out of 19), and about average for living area and lot size. It’s one of the newer, slightly higher-value homes on the street without being the most expensive or largest.