9 Blueberry Bay – Property Summary
Key Characteristics & Buyer Fit
This 1958 bungalow offers 1,384 square feet of living space on a 4,998-square-foot lot. Its standout feature is size: the home is the largest on its street (ranked #1 of 36) and sits in the top 8% of its neighbourhood for living area. That extra space—roughly 300 square feet above the street average—gives it a genuinely roomier feel than most nearby homes, without the premium you might expect.
The assessed value is $287,000, which lands below both the street and neighbourhood averages. In practical terms, this means the home’s price reflects the lot (smaller than average for the area) and the era (1958 construction), not the interior square footage. For a buyer who prioritizes indoor space over yard size or a newer build, that’s the key trade-off.
The lot is on the smaller side—about 600 square feet less than the street average—and the home is older than much of the city’s housing stock. But the street itself is well-established, with homes built around the same period, so the character is consistent.
Who it suits: Buyers who want more interior space than typical for the price, and are comfortable with a modest lot and an older home that likely needs some updating. It's a good fit for someone who values square footage and location over curb appeal or a big backyard. Less suited to families wanting a large yard or those seeking a move-in-ready, modern finish.
Five Possible FAQs
1. How does the assessed value compare to similar homes?
It’s below average at every level: street, neighbourhood, and citywide. The assessed value of $287,000 is about $46,000 less than the street average and $67,000 less than the neighbourhood average. That gap is largely explained by the smaller lot and older construction, not the home’s condition or interior size.
2. Is the living area really that much larger than other homes here?
Yes. At 1,384 square feet, it’s roughly 38% larger than the street average (1,006 sqft) and 27% larger than the neighbourhood average (1,091 sqft). On this street, it’s the largest home by living area.
3. Why is the lot size considered small?
The lot is 4,998 square feet. That’s below average for both the street (5,623 sqft) and the neighbourhood (6,030 sqft). In a city where the typical comparable home sits on over 6,500 square feet, this is a noticeably smaller footprint. It’s around average citywide, though.
4. What does the year built mean for maintenance or renovations?
Built in 1958, it’s older than both the neighbourhood and city averages. That usually means original systems (plumbing, electrical, insulation) may need attention, and layout might reflect mid-century norms. The street is mostly homes from the same era, so neighbourhood character is cohesive—but buyers should budget for potential upgrades.
5. How does this home rank overall in Winnipeg?
It’s around average citywide for living area and lot size, but below average for assessed value. That means you’re getting a home that’s mid-range for the city in terms of space, at a price point that’s on the lower side. The real value is relative to its immediate street and neighbourhood, where it stands out for interior space at a below-average price.