Section 1: Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile
This home at 234 Whitegates Crescent offers a living area of 1,536 square feet, placing it in the top 15% on its street and the top 23% within the Westwood neighbourhood. The property was built in 1966, which aligns closely with the average age of homes both on this street and across the wider community. Its lot measures 5,893 square feet—slightly larger than the street average, though it falls near the middle of the pack when compared to the broader Westwood area and the city as a whole. Assessed at $411,000 for tax purposes, the home sits in the top 15% on the street and top 26% in the neighbourhood, reflecting a value that is above average locally but still close to the citywide median.
The appeal here is about proportion rather than extremes. The home is notably spacious for its immediate street, but neither the lot size nor the build year stand out dramatically against the wider neighbourhood. This makes it a practical fit for buyers who want more interior space than what’s typical on the block, without paying a premium for a large yard or a newer build. It would suit someone looking for a solid, mid-century home in an established area—likely a couple or small family who values square footage and a reasonable tax assessment over curb appeal or renovation potential.
Section 2: Five Possible FAQs
1. How does this home compare to others on Whitegates Crescent?
It ranks in the top 15% for both living area and assessed value, meaning it is one of the larger and more valuable homes on the street. The lot is also above average here, though only slightly.
2. Is the property considered older or newer for its area?
The 1966 build year is essentially the median for both the street and the Westwood neighbourhood. It is not notably old or new—just typical for the area.
3. Why is the assessed value high on the street but only average citywide?
The street itself has a lower average assessed value ($377,000) than both the neighbourhood and the city. So while this home is above average locally, it falls closer to the city’s typical range when compared across all of Winnipeg.
4. Does the lot size offer any advantage?
On the street, the lot is slightly above average, ranking in the top 26%. However, in Westwood and citywide, it lands near the middle. You get a bit more yard than immediate neighbours, but not unusually much for the general area.
5. How should a buyer interpret the “near average” rankings?
Those rankings suggest the home is a solid, unremarkable example of its era and location. That can be a positive: it means the property is unlikely to have unusual quirks or drawbacks tied to extreme age, size, or valuation. It is a straightforward, mid-range option for the neighbourhood.